Because the
Entertainment Weekly coverage and the
Comic-Con trailer have recently given us a lot more insight into the forthcoming
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, I thought it would be a good time to revisit the
purported full-plot synopsis
that was posted on an IMDB comment board a couple months ago. It appears below in block quotes, section by section. If you prefer to see it all in one piece,
go here. [NOTE:
IMDB administrators have since removed the posted synopsis. If this was
requested by WB, it adds
further evidence of the probably validity of the synopsis.] [NOTE: the full-plot synopsis appeared even earlier than IMDB at
4plebs last winter.]
Even though the
BvS
trailer gave us lots of good snippets (and seriously, it is an amazing
trailer!), we still don't ifficially know anything about Luthor's plot, how
Wonder Woman factors in, and what the big threat to Earth is going to
be. If the purported synopsis is accurate, then what follows has lots of
SPOILERS. I am going to take the purported synopsis section by section,
assessing how likely I think it is that each section will actually play
out in the movie and giving my analysis of the plot, character
development, and themes.
Three
years after the Battle of Metropolis, Clark Kent is protecting the
world as Superman and working as a reporter for the Daily Planet
newspaper. Superman has become a controversial figure, with some blaming
him for the destruction caused by General Zod and others believing him
to be a hero.
Likelihood of Legitimacy: 100%.
These
tensions were confirmed in the teaser trailer and even further in the
Comic-Con trailer. I think this is a great way to move forward from
Man of Steel -- a movie I loved but that I know not everyone was on board with. One thing that is undeniable about
MoS,
though, is that it got lots of people talking and the debates continue
even two years later. I think this has a lot to do with the fact that
MoS did
not skirt difficult moral questions by making it seem like there was
one easy answer. I appreciate the creators for taking that approach, but
it is more controversial. Now the controversies are showing up in the
DCEU itself.
We are going to see more Daily Planet scenes in
BvS, which I think will be a good addition to Clark's development in this universe.
Lois Lane is covering the civil war on Khandaq in the
Middle East, while Clark is forced to cover minor stories. He befriends
Jim Olsen, a photographer who lost his legs in Zod's invasion, but
doesn't blame Superman, and applied for the Daily Planet because they
defend Superman, and they cover a football game between Metropolis and
Gotham City in which Clark meets Victor Stone, a quarterback for the
Metropolis team whose father, Dr. Silas Stone, is an robotic engineer at
S.T.A.R. Labs who spearheaded a new high-tech prosthesis program which
includes Jim's legs.
Likelihood of Legitimacy: 80%.
The
presence of Khandaq as a fictional nation and this take on Victor and
Silas Stone aligns well with elements from the New 52 in the comic book
universe. But we don't have any hard evidence of the Khandaq elements,
though I think it makes sense in terms of bring other worldly
controversies into this mix of the controversy around Superman. Is
Superman a U.S. hero? Based on the end of
MoS, it seems that he
does not want to be restricted in that way. But other countries might be
nervous about whether they really want Superman operating within their
borders. Having Lois be our first link into international affairs makes a
lot of sense.
We do know that they shot footage of the
Metropolis v Gotham football game,
but there have been rumors that that scene has since been excised from
the movie. I tend to think that the football game will still appear,
because it makes sense for Victor Stone and it makes sense for the
Metropolis-Gotham rivalry, especially now that we've learned from
Comic-Con that they are sister cities across the bay.
We have also seen on-set photos of
Scoot McNairy with green-socked legs.
This makes sense in terms of CGI prosthetics and he also seemed to be
dressed in a way consistent with a Daily Planet photographer. I have
also said from the beginning that he has a Jimmy (or "Jim") Olsen look.
So I tend to buy the synopsis in this regard. It also makes sense from a
story perspective of putting someone else in place who can defend
Superman against Bruce, Lex, and the Senator who seem to be stirring up
animosity against Superman.