Because the 
Entertainment Weekly coverage and the 
Comic-Con trailer have recently given us a lot more insight into the forthcoming 
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, I thought it would be a good time to revisit the 
purported full-plot synopsis
 that was posted on an IMDB comment board a couple months ago. It appears below in block quotes, section by section. If you prefer to see it all in one piece, 
go here. [NOTE: 
IMDB administrators have since removed the posted synopsis. If this was 
requested by WB, it adds 
further evidence of the probably validity of the synopsis.] [NOTE: the full-plot synopsis appeared even earlier than IMDB at 
4plebs last winter.]
Even though the 
BvS
 trailer gave us lots of good snippets (and seriously, it is an amazing 
trailer!), we still don't ifficially know anything about Luthor's plot, how 
Wonder Woman factors in, and what the big threat to Earth is going to 
be. If the purported synopsis is accurate, then what follows has lots of
 SPOILERS. I am going to take the purported synopsis section by section,
 assessing how likely I think it is that each section will actually play
 out in the movie and giving my analysis of the plot, character 
development, and themes.
Three
 years after the Battle of Metropolis, Clark Kent is protecting the 
world as Superman and working as a reporter for the Daily Planet 
newspaper. Superman has become a controversial figure, with some blaming
 him for the destruction caused by General Zod and others believing him 
to be a hero.
Likelihood of Legitimacy: 100%.
These
 tensions were confirmed in the teaser trailer and even further in the 
Comic-Con trailer. I think this is a great way to move forward from 
Man of Steel -- a movie I loved but that I know not everyone was on board with. One thing that is undeniable about 
MoS,
 though, is that it got lots of people talking and the debates continue 
even two years later. I think this has a lot to do with the fact that 
MoS did
 not skirt difficult moral questions by making it seem like there was 
one easy answer. I appreciate the creators for taking that approach, but
 it is more controversial. Now the controversies are showing up in the 
DCEU itself.
We are going to see more Daily Planet scenes in 
BvS, which I think will be a good addition to Clark's development in this universe.
Lois Lane is covering the civil war on Khandaq in the 
Middle East, while Clark is forced to cover minor stories. He befriends 
Jim Olsen, a photographer who lost his legs in Zod's invasion, but 
doesn't blame Superman, and applied for the Daily Planet because they 
defend Superman, and they cover a football game between Metropolis and 
Gotham City in which Clark meets Victor Stone, a quarterback for the 
Metropolis team whose father, Dr. Silas Stone, is an robotic engineer at
 S.T.A.R. Labs who spearheaded a new high-tech prosthesis program which 
includes Jim's legs.
Likelihood of Legitimacy: 80%.
The
 presence of Khandaq as a fictional nation and this take on Victor and 
Silas Stone aligns well with elements from the New 52 in the comic book 
universe. But we don't have any hard evidence of the Khandaq elements, 
though I think it makes sense in terms of bring other worldly 
controversies into this mix of the controversy around Superman. Is 
Superman a U.S. hero? Based on the end of 
MoS, it seems that he 
does not want to be restricted in that way. But other countries might be
 nervous about whether they really want Superman operating within their 
borders. Having Lois be our first link into international affairs makes a
 lot of sense.
We do know that they shot footage of the 
Metropolis v Gotham football game,
 but there have been rumors that that scene has since been excised from 
the movie. I tend to think that the football game will still appear, 
because it makes sense for Victor Stone and it makes sense for the 
Metropolis-Gotham rivalry, especially now that we've learned from 
Comic-Con that they are sister cities across the bay.
We have also seen on-set photos of 
Scoot McNairy with green-socked legs.
 This makes sense in terms of CGI prosthetics and he also seemed to be 
dressed in a way consistent with a Daily Planet photographer. I have 
also said from the beginning that he has a Jimmy (or "Jim") Olsen look. 
So I tend to buy the synopsis in this regard. It also makes sense from a
 story perspective of putting someone else in place who can defend 
Superman against Bruce, Lex, and the Senator who seem to be stirring up 
animosity against Superman.